← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53408/2025bail granted

Neeraj Kumar Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-11Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53408 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2022 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh S/O Lalaln Singh Resident of Village- Basant Khurd, P.S.-Suppi, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Suppi PS Case No. 76 of 2022 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 234 litres of country made liquor was recovered from motorcycle bearing Regd No. BR30Z5962 an Ditch.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that recovery is made from an open place, which is accessible to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53408 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 one and all. It is further submitted motorcycle in question does not belong to the petitioner. It is next submitted that apprehended co-accused disclosed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Suppi PS Case No. 76 of 2022.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T