Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66988 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -471 Year- 2018 Thana -AGAMKUAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Golu Kumar S/o Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Mahto R/o Village-Sikandarpur Muktidham,P.S. Town,Distt.-Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No.471 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that motorcycle on which he was intercepted was found to be stolen and no ownership of said motorcycle could be produced before the police officer. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he was only pillion rider and had nothing to do with stolen motorcycle. He is in custody since 09.07.2018. Similarly situated case, other accused person has been granted bail by a coordinate
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66988 of 2018 (3) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.11.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.65257 of 2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Patna City in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No.471 of 2018, with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T