Ramesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38250 of 2016 (07) dt.18-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38250 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2014 Thana -BHAWANIPUR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Ramesh Mahto, son of Chando Mahto, resident of Village- Bhalua, P.S. Bhawanipur, District- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha -Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan-A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Seen the report submitted by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Purnia. Gone through the same. The format of the order contains with the P.S. Case number which the lower Court should have seen. When there happens to be specific direction of the Superior Court, then in that event, that order should be treated on priority basis. Had there been sincere effort, no such kind of lapses would have been visualized. As such, with a warning to the District & Sessions Judge, Purnia to be sincere towards the order having been passed by the High Court containing certain direction, to be complied with on priority basis without causing undue delay, the explanation is accepted.

Office to communicate the District & Sessions Judge, Purnia, personally.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38250 of 2016 (07) dt.18-01-2017 Seen the report submitted by the learned lower Court wherefrom it is evident that trial had already been concluded. That being so, instant petition has become infructuous and is accordingly, dismissed.

Vikash/- (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) U T