Rinku Kumar @ Imtiyaz v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62905 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2018 Thana -SINGHESHWAR District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Rinku Kumar @ Imtiaz, S/o Bibek Yadav @ Imtiaz @ Md. Moin @ Moeim Ansari, Resident of Village- Satokhar, P.S. Singheshwar, DistrictMadhepura & Resident of Village- Tetrahi, P.S. Pipra, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 42/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant alleged that while she was entering into the temple at the gate one pick-pocketer taking Rs. 1000/- by tearing polythene of the informant started fleeing away. On alarm, people caught him and Rs. 1,000/- was recovered from him. Local people disclosed his name as Rinku Kumar (petitioner). It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He is deaf and dumb. Petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62905 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 42/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T