Vinod Kamkar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67889 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Buxar ====================================================== Vinod Kamkar s/o Bihari Kamkar resident of village Purainiya P.S. Sikraul Lakh, District Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Munna Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Excise Case No. 116(0) of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 51.84 Litres of foreign liquor from the house of Sanjharo Devi and petitioner who was present in the house of Sanjharo Devi after seeing the raiding party tried to flee away but was caught.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 11.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67889 of 2018(2) dt.27-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-2nd-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Buxar, in connection with Excise Case No. 116(0) of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U