← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63008/2021bail granted

Tijendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-12Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63008 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2021 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== TIJENDRA KUMAR @ JITENDRA KUMAR Son of Naresh Chaudhary Resident of Village- Natinbigha (Mafi), P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 307, 396 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, it is stated that one Ayush Kumar along with four other accused persons committed dacoity in the house of the informant wherein her brother was killed and other family members injures.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name transpired in course of investigation when allegedly he was caught using one of the looted mobile phones. It is further submitted that no incriminating material has transpired against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged crime. Inspite of being in custody

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63008 of 2021(3) dt.12-05-2022 2/2 since 5.8.2021, the petitioner has not been put on TI parade and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. He has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the material that has transpired in course of investigation, the petitioner not having been put on T.I. Parade inspite of being in custody for 9 months and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Barbigha(Mission O.P.) P.S. Case no. 209 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U