Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41992 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2016 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar Son of Ram Janam Mahto Resident of Mohalla - Dujra Devi Asthan, P.S. Budha Colony, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is said to have assembled along with several others armed with fire arms and made attempt to grab the land of the informant, but as submitted on behalf of the petitioner only two mobile sets are said to have been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner for which the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2016 and other similarly situated co-accused Kislay Kumar has been allowed bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 40269 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41992 of 2016 (2) dt.18-10-2016 2/2 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this court. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned S.D.J.M. Raxaul, Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T