Kripal Sahni@ Ram Kripal Sahni And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.65866 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2016 Thana- BISFI (PATAUNA) District- Madhubani ======================================================
1. Kripal Sahni @ Ram Kripal Sahni, Son of Late Tithar Sahni,
2. Brijbhan Sahni @ Brij Mohan Sahni, Son of Late Rameshwar Sahni,
3. Upendra Sahni, Son of Jaldhari Sahni @ Laldhari Sahni,
4. Vinay Sahni, Son of Late Khublal Sahni,
5. Shankar Sahni, Son of Kusheshwar Sahni,
6. Bhola Sahni, Son of Suttu Sahni,
7. Suresh Sahni, Son of Late Suttu Sahni,
8. Santosh Sahni, Son of Chauthi Sahni,
9. Meena Devi, Wife of Vinay Sahni,
10. Sudhina Devi, Wife of Singheshwar Sahni, 11.Krishna Sahni, Son of Shivnandan Sahni,
12. Lalit Sahni, Son of Late Lakhan Sahni,
13. Ram Sahdeo Sahni @ Sahdeo Sahni, Son of Late Laldhari Sahni, All are residents of Village- Parsauni, Police Station- Bisfi, O.P. Patauna, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Same be kept on the record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioners
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65866 of 2018(2) dt.01-11-2018 2/2 assaulted the informant and her husband with lathi, danda, due to which they sustained injuries.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. No specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners. The nature of injury is said to be simple. Hence, no offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi (Patauna) P.S. case No.222 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. No.889 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T