Domi Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44055 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Domi Mandal Son of Late Ayodhi Mandal, Resident of Village-Sakhua, P.S.- Marauna, District- Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 504, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-b)A/26 of the Arms Act. The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 56502/2015 and this Court, vide order dated 5.2.2016, rejected the same with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in jail custody. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 9.9.2015.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44055 of 2016 (2) dt.05-10-2016 2/2 let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any valid rhyme or reason, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T