← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13859/2022disposed

Kanhaiya Lal Bhaskar @ K.L. Bhaskar (In Person) v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-28The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13859 of 2022 ====================================================== Kanhaiya Lal Bhaskar @ K.L. Bhaskar (in person), Son of Late Ramayan Prasad, Resident of Sasaram Town, Police Station Sasaram, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

District Magistrate Rohtas, Rohtas at Sasaram. 4.

Archaeological Survey of India through its Secretary, Government of India, New Delhi.

5.

Revenue and Land Reforms Department through its Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Bihar State Tourism Department through its Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

Art, Youth and Culture Department, through its Principal Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna.

8.

Executive Officer/Administrator, Sasaram Municipal Corporation, Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Prachi Pallavi, Amicus Curiae Mr. Amit Narayan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-07-2023 The writ petition was essentially agitating the cause of supply of fresh water in Shershah Rauza Tank.

2. The petitioner, who appears in person, is not present today.

3. The learned Amicus Curiae appointed by the Court, on the basis of the three counter affidavits filed, submits that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.13859 of 2022(16) dt.28-07-2023 2/2 grievance is redressed.

4. The learned AAG also submits on instructions that what was sought for by the petitioner has now been complied with.

5. In such circumstances, we find no reason to keep the writ petition pending.

6. The writ petition stands closed.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/avinash U