Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53406/2025dismissed

Ravi Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53406 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-719 Year-2023 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Ravi Ram S/o Bihari Ram R/o Village- Sion, P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S.Case No. 719 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 302 of the IPC.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 20.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.33849 of 2024, which reads as under:- " Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S.Case No.

719 of 2023 registered for the offence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53406 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 under section 341,323,324,307/34 and section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are said to have assaulted the victim in which the victim died.

4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has sustained one injury and the same has been given by one Pappu Ram.

5. I have gone through the records. There is allegation against all the accused persons of having assaulted the victim. In the post mortem report, multiple injuries have been found.

6. In view of the aforesaid fact, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T