M/S K.C. Jain Travels v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12100 of 2024 ====================================================== M/S K.C. Jain Travels through its partner Sohan Ram Panwar, S/o Gorakh Ram Panwar, aged about 54 years, Male, Resident of 7/59, New Power House Road, Sector 7, Jodhpur, P.S.-Jodhpur, District-Jodhpur, State-Rajasthan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise and Prohibition Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Excise Commissioner, Head Quarter Bihar, Patna. 4.

District Magistrate, Madhubani.

5.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

6.

The Superintendent of Police Excise, Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adarsh Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Mujlabaul Haque G.P.12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 31-08-2024 In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- A. For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to release and discharge the bus from any charges labelled on the Bus Registration no.-UP-95-T-4727 which has been wrongly seized by Police in connection with Fulpras Town P.S. Case No. 477/2022 on dated 08.10.2022 registered for the offence under Section 30 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

B. For issuance of any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioners are found entitled under the facts and circusmtances of the present case.

2. In support of aforementioned relief, there is no demand before the competent authority in particularly under Rule 12 A of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12100 of 2024 dt.31-08-2024 2/2 Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 read with amended sub Rule 2 of Rule 12 A in the year 2022 and 2023.

3. In the absence of demand before the competent authority, the present writ petition for writ of mandamus is not maintainable or it is pre-mature. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as pre-mature.

4. Disposal of the present petition would not be a hurdle for the petitioner to invoke remedy under Rule 12 A of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 including amended provisions in the year 2022 and 2023. If such application is submitted in the prescribed form before the competent authority, the competent authority shall pass speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application.

5. With the above observation, the present petition stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- AFR/NAFR NA CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.09.2024 Transmission Date NA