← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9118/2021dismissed

Amna Khatoon @ Rahima Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9118 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2018 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== AMNA KHATOON @ RAHIMA KHATOON W/O MD. ELHAM R/O VILLAGE-MIRZAPUR BARDAH, P.S-MUFASSIL, DISTRICT-MUNGER ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 334 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 121, 379, 414, 120(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-a), 25(1-aa), 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and section 39 of the UAP Act.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner Amna Khatoon was arrested and her confessional statement was recorded in which she disclosed the name of other co-accused persons involved in the alleged occurrence. It is further alleged that on the disclosure of this petitioner one bag containing two AK 47 rifle was recovered near Kabristan of village Mirzapur Bardah.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9118 of 2021(2) dt.17-02-2021 2/2 It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Other coaccused persons have been granted bail by different Benches of this court. Petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2018. Learned APP however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that on the disclosure of this petitioner arms were recovered and petitioner bears criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T