← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62580/2021bail granted

Satyanarayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-14Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62580 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2021 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== SATYANARAYAN YADAV Son of Laldev Yadav Resident of Village - Kama Bigha, P.s.- Nagar, Distt.- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 94.5 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the tempo in question.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62580 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 2/2 Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 94.5 liters wine is recovered from the tempo in question. The said tempo is run as public carrier. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the nature of goods booked by the transporter. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IIcum- Special Judge, Excise, Aurangabad in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 354/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T