Bikky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54754 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -135 Year- 2016 Thana -WARSALIGANJ District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Bikky Kumar, Son of Ramji Yadav @ Ramji Prasad, resident of Village- Gordhowa, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Kamaluddin For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshnand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 9.9.2016 in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 135 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner but on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, the petitioner has been made accused in this case. He has not been put on T.I. Parade and he is in custody for more than four months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and considering the submissions, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54754 of 2016 (3) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S.Case No. 135 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U