Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66405/2018disposed

Pujo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-22Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66405 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Pujo Yadav S/o Late Bhochi Yadav R/o Village- Karari Tintanga,P.S. Gopalpur,Distt.-Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 235 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 16 live cartridges from his possession.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

However, after nine months of custody the petitioner would be enlarge on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66405 of 2018(2) dt.22-11-2018 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Naugachia, in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 235 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T