Shatrudhan Prasad @ Shatrudhan Kumar @ Shatrughan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52396 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2024 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Shatrudhan Prasad @ Shatrudhan Kumar @ Shatrughan Prasad S/O Devendra Prasad @ Devendra Yadav R/o Village - Chakwajitpur, P.S - Karay Parshuray, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajendra Gop S/O Late Ramvaran Gop R/o Village - Chakwajitpur, P.S - Karay Parshuray, District - Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 19.01.2025 and charges have been framed. It is further submitted that in sum and substance, the allegation is that petitioner, who runs the coaching institute, kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52396 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 victim has come back and her statement was recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Karay Parshuray P.S. Case No. 60 of 2024.
7. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T