Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65789/2018bail granted

Digvijay Nath Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-19Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65789 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2018 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== Digvijay Nath Tiwari Son of late Bhuneshwar Nath Tiwari Resident of Village- Kapiya Jagir, P.O. Maharajganj, P.S. Maharajganj, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Anuj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 148 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411, 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of Electrical wire along with FIR named accused. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 06.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65789 of 2018(2) dt.19-11-2018 2/2 Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 148 of 2018 , with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U