Wali Rahmani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52842 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE SIMRAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== Wali Rahmani S/o Md. Kalam Azad Resident of Village- Jhitkiya, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Singheshwar, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surya Narayan Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in B.P. Case No. 721/2025 in connection with Excise Simrahi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 dated 11.05.2025 relates to Excise Case No. 775/2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 158.500 litres of codeine cough syrup was recovered from the four wheeler vehicle in which two accused persons were found sitting in the said car and they started fleeing away but one accused person was apprehended who disclosed his name as Wali Rahmani (petitioner) and he also disclosed the name of the co-accused person as
2/4 Niranjan Kumar @ Nitish Kumar (driver) who fled away from there.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the seized vehicle and he has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner is one of the occupants of the seized vehicle. Learned counsel has further submitted that the seized contraband is commercial quantity i.e. 158.500 litres of cough syrup containing codeine. The petitioner had no valid authorization for keeping the same. It is further submitted that this case comes under the NDPS Act and Drugs and Cosmetics Act as per section 80 of the NDPS Act. Learned APP for the State also placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Hira Singh and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Anr, (2020)20 Supreme Court Cases 272 of Hon'ble Apex Court has held that "weight of entire materials/ mixture along with neutral material is to be considered for ascertainment of weather the
3/4 quantity is "small quantity" or "commercial quantity".
6. As per Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, the two conditions are that the Court should be satisfied with :- (i) There are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of such offence; and (ii) He is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
7. If either of these two conditions is not satisfied, the bar operates and the accused cannot be released on bail. The Court is of the opinion that the parameters of bail available under Section 37 of the Act have not satisfied in the facts of the instant case. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mohit Aggarwal 2022 SCC OnLine SC 891 has held that "The length of the period of his custody or the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed and the trial has commenced are by themselves not considerations that can be treated as persuasive grounds for granting relief to the respondent under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act."
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the recovery of commercial quantity of cough syrup containing codeine from the conscious possession of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the same is rejected in connection with Simrahi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 pending in the court of learned Court of Special
4/4 Exclusive Excise Court No. 2, Supaul.
9. The application stands rejected.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T