Dhan Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49126 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2018 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== DHAN LAL YADAV, Gender, Male, aged about 34 years, Son of Yamuna Yadav Resident of Village - Lalu Ka Dera, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amaresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of giving Rami blow on the head of the informant as a result of which he fell down and sustained grievous injuries.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that injuries sustained is simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 21.05.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49126 of 2019(4) dt.01-10-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sahpur P.S. Case No. 266 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T