Dinesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66996 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -238 Year- 2018 Thana -MANER District- PATNA ====================================================== Dinesh Rai Son of Ram Babu Rai R/o Goraiya Asthan Neelkanth Tola Goraiya Asthan,P.S. Maner,Distt.-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Special Case No.4833 of 2018 arising out of Maner P.S. Case No.238 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Madhya Nishedh and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation is of recovery of 120 litres of wine. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that he was not apprehended on the spot and he has been apprehended after five months of lodging of FIR only on the basis of suspicion. He has no criminal antecedent had is in custody since 17.09.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66996 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Act, Patna in connection with Special Case No.4833 of 2018 arising out of Maner P.S. Case No.238 of 2018, with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T