Saheba Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar Through The Drector General Of Police, Patna, Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1175 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2021 Thana- KURLIKOT District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Saheba Khatoon Wife of Anzar Alam R/V- Besarbati Panchyat, Ward No. 18, Kowa Bhitta, P.S- Kurlikot, Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Drector General of Police, Patna, Bihar Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Patna, Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate , Kishanganj 4.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Patna, Bihar 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Kishanganj 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Thakurganj, Kishanganj 7.

The District Programme Officer, Kishanganj 8.

The S.H.O., KurliKot P.S., Kishanganj 9.

Salma Khatoon W/o Iftekhar Alam R/V- Kaua Bhita, Ward 18, P.O Nenchgach, P.S- Kurlikot, Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravish Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-04-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State present.

The present criminal writ application has been filed by the petitioner for commanding respondent nos. 5 and 8 to immediately, urgently and pro-actively arrest the accused person in connection with Kurlikot P.S. Case No. 106 of 2021 dated 14.12.2021 lodged under Sections 420/ 468/ 467/ 471/ 177/ 120(B) of the I.P.C.

The second prayer which petitioner has demanded that urgently, process under Sections 82 and 83 of Cr.P.C be

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1175 of 2022 dt.18-04-2023 2/2 issued and six more prayers have been made relating to seeking explanation preventing from conducting fair and proper investigation, preventing from lodging F.I.R., demanding answer that trial has not initiated, delay in hearing of the case, explanation from respondent ignoring representation and any other relief.

Counsel submits that police is completely reluctant and not arresting the accused persons. This is the primary relief of the petitioner.

Counsel for the State submits that the relief which petitioner is seeking cannot be permitted because the allegation of not doing investigation properly is not correct. Police has collected material and verified the documents visiting Hyderabad and found that the documents are false and in due process of law, every action shall be taken place. In the present facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to interfere in this matter, therefore, this criminal writ application stands dismissed.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date