← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56321/2023disposed

Smt. Anjali Sainani v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-28Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56321 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-556 Year-2021 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Smt. Anjali Sainani Wife Of Manoj Nari Sainani Resident Of B/1901-1602, Brook Hill Tower Co-Operative Society Ltd., Road No.3 Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri West, Police Station - Oshiwara, Mumbai In The District Of Mumbai (MAHARASTRA) 2.

Shabana Chawla Wife Of Sumit Singh Chawla Resident Of Navi Mandal Banglow, B-4, Gulmohar Cross Road No.07, Andheri West, Mumbai, Police Station - Versova In The District Of Mumbai (MAHARASTRA). 3.

Kewal Dilip Mehta @ Kewal Mehta Son Of Dilip Mehta Resident Of 12/64, Sagarika Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Near Lilawati Hospital Bandra Reclamation Bandra (WEST), Mumbai, Police Station - Oshiwara In The District Of Mumbai (MAHARASTRA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 556 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

The learned APP submits that the offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56321 of 2023(6) dt.28-06-2024 2/3 years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the OP No. 2.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that investigation in the case is still pending against the petitioners, on which the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

5.

In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). 6.

The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 13-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56321 of 2023(6) dt.28-06-2024 3/3 2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T