← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53099/2022disposed

Pappu Paswan @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-16Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53099 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2022 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Pappu Paswan @ Sanjeev Kumar S/O Late Nagina Paswan R/O VillageGobarsahi, P.S.- Muzaffarpur Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

There is recovery of 6.660 litres of Indian made foreign liquor and one person apprehended from the spot who disclose his name as Pankaj Sah. Local chowkidar disclose the name of petitioner as a person who fled away from the place of seizure.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53099 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 The petitioner has no concern with the seized illicit liquor. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner is accused in three other cases apart from the present one. Learned APP appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has three antecedents of similar nature. Considering the fact that petitioner is accused in three other cases apart from the present one, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to surrender before learned concerned Court and pray for regular bail. The learned concerned Court may consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, keeping in view the facts discussed above and without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) nirajkrs/- U T