Ashok Kumar Gupta v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1629 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1202 of 2017 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Gupta, aged about 55 years, Son of Sri Saryug Prasad Gupta, Resident of Mohalla- Mithapur, Opposite Ram Jatan Brothers Timber Merchant, Mithapur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union Of India through the Secretary, Home Department, New Delhi

2. The Inspector General of Police, BCC, RPF Sheikhpura, Patna.

3. The DIGP, Special Range, CRPF, R.K. Puram, New Delhi.

4. The Additional DIGP group Centre, CRPF, Jam Shedpur.

5. The Commandant, 118, Bn, CRPF, C/o 56 APO, Mokama Ghat, Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Alka Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S.D Sanjay Addl. Soc. Gen.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 20-02-2019 We have perused the office note and not less than 12 defects were pointed out by the office as back as on 8.11.2017 and which also included a defect that second copy of the brief of the 2nd Member forming the Division Bench is not filed. Defects no. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are stated to have been removed but the remaining defects yet subsist. This itself shows the seriousness with which the petitioner is pursuing his cause. That two years period has not been found sufficient for removal of the defects as well taking note that for a similar default the writ petition has also been rejected for not removing

Patna High Court MJC No.1629 of 2017(3) dt.20-02-2019 2/2 the defects within the peremptory time given by the Court in the order dated 30.1.2017, we reject the restoration application as well.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) Surendra/- U