Ram Pravesh Mahto And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32027 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana -KANTI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Ram Pravesh Mahto, S/o Ram Bilash Mahto.
2. Santosh Kumar, S/o Ram Pravesh Mahto.
3. Fekani Devi, W/o Ram Pravesh Mahto.
R/o Village-Bakatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar (A.P.P.) ======================================================
CORAM:
HONOURABLE MR.
JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Kanti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 447, 448, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Prevention of Witch Practices Act, 1999.
In view of the submission made on behalf of the petitioners that petty dispute between the children of the both sides is the reason behind institution of the First
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32027 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 2/2 Information Report and that the injuries sustained are simple in nature, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to these petitioners.
This application is, accordingly, allowed. Let the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3, abovenamed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall liable to be cancelled.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T