Raushan Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31841 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4179 Year- 2013 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Raushan Singh, Son of Chandeshwar Singh, resident of Village-Chandmari Coling, Jorafatak Dhanbad, P.S.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Dinesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Sital Singh, resident of VillageJurawanpur Barari, P.S.-Jurawanpur, District-Vaishali, presently residing at Dinesh Singh, Manish Coaching Center, House of Sharmaji Durga, Mandir Road, Jai Prakash Nagar, Patna-1.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra (A.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-08-2015 This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Complaint Case No. 4179 of 2013 (Trial No. 3939 of 2014), disclosing offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Pursuant to this Court's order dated 13/08/2015, the petitioner as well as his wife, namely, Nishu are present. I had the occasion to hear them.

It appears that matrimonial discord is the real reason behind institution of the complaint petition and no tangible purpose will be served if the petitioner is taken into custody in this matter or his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31841 of 2015 (4) dt.21-08-2015 2/2 This application is, accordingly, allowed. Let the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 4179 of 2013 (Trial No. 3939 of 2014), subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall liable to be cancelled.

The parties have stated before this Court that they are not willing to live together. It is needless to say that they may approach before Court of competent jurisdiction for dissolution of their marriage with consent, disposal of which can be expedited.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T