← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47154/2016rejected

Kanhayia Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2016-11-09Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47154 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -755 Year- 2014 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== Kanhayia Sharma S/o Late Fand Lal sharma Resident of Village- Dhobia Tola , P.S. - K. Hat (Madhubani) , Distt. - Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected on 09.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 647 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 27.11.2014, other co-accused have been allowed bail, in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner was caught with firearm and from his possession mobile was recovered from which ransom was demanded and the petitioner is involved in six more cases and the case of the petitioner is on different footing to that of other co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47154 of 2016 (2) dt.09-11-2016 2/2 accused.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected in connection with S.T. No. 50 of 2015 arising out of K. Hat P.S. 755 of 2014 pending in the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge- 1st, Purnea.

However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T