← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56070/2024bail granted

Cham Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56070 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2021 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Cham Sahani Son Of Etawari Sahani Vill - Gosai Tola, Ward No. 21, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

2.

Pavia Devi Wife Of Cham Sahani Vill - Gosai Tola, Ward No. 21, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

3.

Chotu Kumar @ Prem Chotu Kumar Son Of Cham Sahani Vill - Gosai Tola, Ward No. 21, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Khushboo Kumari Wife Of Shatrudhan Sahani Village- Ejanighat, PsBirupur, Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Adv.

Mr. Ankit Kumar Jha, Adv.

Ms. Rakhi Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 253-C of 2024 registered under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against these petitioners is of matrimonial cruelty and demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56070 of 2024(2) dt.09-09-2024 2/2 implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the complainant respectively. Petitioners are victims of over implications. They are separate in mess and property and have never tortured the complainant and demanded any dowry. Thrust of accusation is against husband of the complainant.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, on furnishing bailbonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-I, Lakhisarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 253-C of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T