Bablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43415 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2015 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ====================================================== Bablu Yadav, Son of Saudagar Yadav, Resident of Village-Bhaluyana, P.S.- Chandradip, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No.32 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made that petitioner along with other accused persons have kidnapped the son of the informant, but he could escape from the confinement and save his life. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come during investigation and the victim in his 164 statement has not taken the name of the petitioner. He further submits that co-accused Gorelal Yadav and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43415 of 2016 (2) dt.06-10-2016 2/2 Rambilash Yadav, have been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.3098 of 2016.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner-Bablu Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M.-IV, Nawada, in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No.32 of 2015 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/wife/son of the petitioner;

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T