Rajesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49592 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-888 Year-2017 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAJESH RAM, aged 32 years, Male, Son of Raghu Ram, Resident of Village-Sirisiya Srirampur, P.S.-Kathaiya, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

Shila Devi, Female, Wife of Rajesh Ram, Daughter of Vishwanath Ram, Resident of Village-Kamal Pakri, P.S.-Kalyanpur, Post Office-Kusumpur Darmaha, District-East Champaran, Pin no.845432. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.05.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 406 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49592 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. (West), Muzaffarpur, in connection with Trial No. 4627 of 2017, arising out of Complaint Case No. 888 of 2017. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T