Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43489/2016bail granted

Nuno Hansda v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-18Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43489 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -306 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictPURNIA ====================================================== Nuno Hansda S/o Late Kali Hansda resident of Village- Satpura Karu Tola (Santhali), P.S.- Bhawanipur, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocates For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2016 in connection with C.I. No. 306 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 47(a) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in fact, no recovery of country made liquor has been made from his conscious possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with C.I. No. 306 of 2016 with the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43489 of 2016 (2) dt.18-10-2016 2/2 (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T