Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9222/2021disposed

Chano Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9222 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2020 Thana- NIMACHANDPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

CHANO PASWAN SON OF LATE BINO PASWAN 2.

ANKUSH KUMAR SON OF CHANO PASWAN 3.

PAWAN DEVI WIFE OF CHANO PASWAN 4.

KHUSHBU DEVI D/O CHANO PASWAN All are R/O VILLAGE- BANDWAR (BADHAI TOLA), WARD NO. 5, P.S.- NEEMACHANDPURA, DIST.- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Neema Chandpura P.S. Case No. 53/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In view of the fact that petitioner No. 2 (Ankush Kumar) and petitioner No. 4 (Khushbu Devi) are son and daughter of the petitioner No. 1 and they have no direct role in the death of the deceased, their anticipatory bail application is allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9222 of 2021(2) dt.06-12-2021 2/2 Accordingly, let the petitioner No. 2 (Ankush Kumar) and petitioner No. 4 (Khushbu Devi) be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Neema Chadpura P.S. Case No. 53/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

So far as petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 3 are concerned, they are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased.

Considering the allegations levelled against petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 3, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected.

They are directed to surrender within four weeks. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T