Magan Singh @ Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49301 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2018 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== MAGAN SINGH @ NAGENDRA SINGH Son of Late Mosafir Singh Resident of Village-Dubhal, P.S-Magadh Medical, District-Gaya (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 185 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-B), 26 and 35 of Arms Act. Petitioner had earlier moved this Court for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 74239 of 2018 which was rejected on 14.12.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49301 of 2019(2) dt.07-08-2019 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 30.07.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 4th, Gaya, in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 185 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) veena/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49301 of 2019(2) dt.07-08-2019 3/3 U T