Ajay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56283 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajay Sahani, S/o Bachhalal Sahani @ Bachhalal Choudhary, Resident of Village - Jaysinghpur, Bhisra, P.S. - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025

1. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sugauli P. S. Case No. 129 of 2025, dated 21.03.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S.

3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that as per the allegation, three unknown persons riding on an Apache motorcycle first overtook the informant's motorcycle and thereafter stopped him forcefully and snatched his motorcycle, admittedly, the FIR was registered against unknown persons and the petitioner has been made accused mainly on the basis of the revelation made by co-accused Vivek Kumar from whose house the looted motorcycle was recovered, except the said revelation made by the co-accused before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56283 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 police, there is nothing to connect the petitioner to the alleged loot. It is further submitted that the petitioner has a clean past history, has never involved in such type of alleged offence in the past and has been languishing in jail since 25.03.2025 in the present matter.

4. Though learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner but fairly accepts that except the statement of co-accused Vivek Kumar made before the police, there is nothing against this petitioner as per the trial court's order.

5. Considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel and mainly petitioner's fair and clean antecedent, his custody period and the completion of investigation against him, this court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above, be enlarged on bail in connection with Sugauli P. S. Case No. 129 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U T