Ajit Kumar Mandal @ Ajit Mandal @ Ajit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45509 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 1999 Thana -JADIA District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Mandal @ Ajit Mandal @ Ajit Yadav, Son of Kamleshwari Mandal.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

From perusal of the impugned order I find that cognizance against the petitioner was taken in the year 2000 and subsequently, in the year 2008 petitioner surrendered and granted bail. However, the trial of the petitioner remained pending till 13.01.2016 when his bail bond was cancelled due to his non appearance before the trial court. Moreover, petitioner was again remanded by the trial court on 20.08.2016 and since then he is languishing in jail custody.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45509 of 2016 (2) dt.19-10-2016 2/2 well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Supaul in connection with Jadiya P.S. Case No. 46 of 1999, subject to condition that he shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of six months or till conclusion of his trial whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T