Patna High CourtCR. MISC./847/2017bail granted

Shyam Kishor Mahto @ Shyam Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.847 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -284 Year- 2016 Thana -BAHADURPUR District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Shyam Kishor Mahto @ Shyam Kumar Mahto S/o- late Gulab Mahto Residence of Vill- Ughra, Nimha Tol (Pator O.P.), P.S.- Bahadurpur, DisttDarbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kedar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that 1.5 liters country made liquor have been recovered and the petitioner is in custody since 16.7.2016 i.e. for about six months and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the aforesaid facts.

Having heard both sides, in view of the period of custody and the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Class

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.847 of 2017 (2) dt.02-02-2017 Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 284 of 2016 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of the trial and make himself available as and when required by the court below and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Rishi/- U T