Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43537/2016bail granted

Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43537 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAGARIA GRP CASE District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar, Son of Sri Arjun Yadav, Resident of Bihpur (Near Civil Police Station), P.S. Bihpur, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2016 in connection with Naugachiya R.P.F. P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Section 3 of R.P. (U.P.) Act (Amendment 2012).

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on suspicion as even according to the seizure list, only an old mobile phone has been recovered from the petitioner and there is no material whatsoever to connect him with the alleged offence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Railway, Khagaria in connection with Naugachiya R.P.F. P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43537 of 2016 (2) dt.20-10-2016 2/2 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T