Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10354/2021bail rejected

Basant Kumar @ Basant Kumar Singh @ Kare Lal v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-22Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10354 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-617 Year-2020 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== BASANT KUMAR @ BASANT KUMAR SINGH @ KARE LAL SON OF RATAN KUMAR SINGH @ RATAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEJAHANGIRA SHOBHANI, P.S.- GANGOUR, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-12-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 147, 431, 188, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Khagaria (Gangaur) P.S.Case No. 617 of 2020.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that he was a member of a mob which created road jam and despite request of the police, they did not clear the jam. He has submitted further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10354 of 2021(2) dt.22-12-2021 2/2 that on similar allegation the learned court below has granted anticipatory bail to co-accused Babloo Kumar, but rejected the petition in respect of the present petitioner mentioning that three criminal cases are pending against the petitioner, whereas only one case has been disclosed in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition.

It appears that the petitioner has concealed two criminal cases, which are also pending against him. In these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T