Rajendra Bind v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55966 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Rajendra Bind S/o Butai Bind Resident of Village - Gamhari, P.S. - Goh, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 88/2025 lodged on 17.03.2025, for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2),74, 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against two named accused persons, including the petitioner. It is alleged therein that the accused persons assaulted the informant and his brother with a sword and garasa. It is further alleged that the accused persons also assaulted the wife
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55966 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 of the informant and snatched her jewellery.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. It is contended that although the alleged occurrence took place on 11.03.2025, but the F.I.R. was lodged belatedly on 17.03.2025, after a delay of six days. The informant and the accused persons are father and son, and the dispute arose on account of monetary transactions relating to Indira Awas, which led to a scuffle causing injuries to both sides. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also instituted Complaint Case No. 58/2025 against the present informant. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are not specific, but general and omnibus in nature. Though the petitioner is an accused in one more criminal case, he has already been granted bail therein.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. In the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ₹30000/- (thirty thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1) (d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55966 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 Magistrate, 1st Class, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 88/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T