Md. Kadir @ Rohit v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57303 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2023 Thana- BARAUNI RAIL P.S. District- Begusarai ====================================================== Md. Kadir @ Rohit Son of Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid VillagePokhar Mohalla Shukh Lal Tola, Ward No 19, Shokhara, Police StationPhulwariya, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barauni Rail P.S. Case No. 320 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that when the petitioner was travelling by train, one person snatched his mobile phone and fled away. The informant chased the miscreant and caught him but his two-three other associates also came there and started assaulting the informant. It is further alleged that the miscreants also snatched other belongings of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57303 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/3 informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Md. Kaiyum. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Barauni Rail P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57303 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 3/3 Case No. 320 of 2023.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T