Patna High CourtCWJC/10748/2015disposed

Subhwanti Institute Of Education v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-07Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10748 of 2015 ====================================================== Subhwanti Institute Of Education, Plot No.282, Village- Pachaura, P.O.- Aghaila, P.S.- Siwan Mufasil, Tehsil/Taluka-Siwan, Town/City-Siwan, Bihar- 841226, through its Secretary Satish Kumar Rai, Aged about 44 years, Son of Sri Sudama Rai, Resident of Vikash Nagar, Road No.2, Sandalpur Road, Mahendru, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna-6. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Director, Research and Training, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Director Administration-cum-Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

5. Jai Prakash University, Chapra through the Vice-Chancellor.

6. The Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

7. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

8. N.C.T.E., Hans Bhawan, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi through its Chairman.

9. The Chairman, N.C.T.E., Hans Bhawan, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi

10. The Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, N.C.T.E. Bhubhaneshwar, Orissa. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kamal For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar For the University:

Mr. Mrigendra Kumar For the State:

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh For the NCTE:

Mr. S. N. Pathak ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER *************** 05.

07.09.2015 Keeping in mind the notification, dated 04.09.2015, a copy of which has been tendered to the Court, the prayer of the petitioner stands allowed. Writ application has become infructuous.

Writ application is disposed off as having become infructuous.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) U SKM/-