Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7133/2017bail granted

Vicky Yadav @ Vikash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7133 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2016 Thana -DHANGAI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Vicky Yadav @ Vikash Yadav, son of Subash Singh, resident of VillageMadriha, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh with Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Dhangai P.S.Case No. 70 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for about three months and he has been falsely implicated in this case and other co-accused has been granted bail by the court below itself.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that there is no allegation against the petitioner, he has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7133 of 2017 (2) dt.20-02-2017 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Dhangai P.S.Case No. 70 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U