Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18721 of 2021 ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Son of Jawahar Lal Resident of Village-Pachrukhi Kothi, Police Station-Akbarpur, District-Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary-Cum-Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Departemnt, Government of Bihar. 2.
The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3.
The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Nawada. 4.
The Additional Collector, Nawada.
5.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Rajauli, Nawada. 6.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Rajauli.
7.
The Circle Officer, Akbarpur Block, Nawada.
8.
The Station House Officer, Akbarpur, Police Station, Nawada. 9.
Gayatri Devi, Daughter of Bhukhan Mahto, Resident of Village-Pachrukhi Kothi, Police Station-Akbarpur, District-Nawada. 10.
Bedami Devi Wife of Bhukhan Mahto Resident of Village-Pachrukhi Kothi, Police Station-Akbarpur, District-Nawada.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (Sc25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2.Writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent authorities to remove illegal possession of the part of constructed house of the petitioner from private respondent no. 9 and 10.
3. It is settled position of law that the writ jurisdiction of the High Court does not extend to dispute between private parties relating to properties, right and title. It is a pure civil
Patna High Court CWJC No.18721 of 2021(3) dt.22-11-2023 2/2 dispute for which, a regular suit in a competent civil court is the only remedy. The same cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction by impleading some public authority and seeking direction against them.
4. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U