Dhruv Kumar Das @ Dhruv Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57800 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2011 Thana- LODIPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Dhruv Kumar Das @ Dhruv Das Son Of Late Khachi Das R/V- VillageGobardhanpur, P.S.- Lodipur, Distt.- Bhagalpur 2.

Chandan Das @ Chandan Kumar Das Son Of Dhrub Kumar Das R/VVillage- Gobardhanpur, P.S.- Lodipur, Distt.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vivekanand Vivek For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-10-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 337, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on added Section 302 of the IPC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have antecedent of two cases. It is next submitted that when the FIR was instituted the same was instituted under bailable sections as such the petitioners were granted the privilege of bail but after investigation Section 302 of the IPC was added and thereafter the bail granted to the petitioners was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57800 of 2024(2) dt.04-10-2024 2/2 cancelled by the learned trial court, against which the petitioners contested up till this court but with no success, as such, it cannot be said that petitioners were evading the process of law, rather they were availing their remedies and when ultimately they could not succeed in getting the order of bail restored, they surrendered on 13-4-2024. It is next submitted that petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove their innocence.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

5.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No.65 of 2011.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T