Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69488 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2018 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== Sunil Yadav son of Morpiya Yadav, resident of Village- Azad Bigha, Police Station- Magadh Medical, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 213 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(A)(D) of the Bihar Prohibition and Amendment Act, 2016. Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 40 litres of Mahua liquor from his house.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69488 of 2018(2) dt.05-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya, in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 213 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T