← Library
Patna High CourtC.Misc./945/2025disposed

Dr. Gauri Shankar Lal @ Gauri Shanker Lal v. Md. Imtiyaz Hussain

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.945 of 2025 ====================================================== Dr. Gauri Shankar Lal @ Gauri Shanker Lal S/O Late Mithu lal Rai, R/O Quality Corner Building, Opposite Hanuman Mandir, Boring Road Chauraha, Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Md. Imtiyaz Hussain S/O Late Md. Arif Hussain R/O Mohalla- New Colony Bans Kothi, Digha, Distt.- Patna, at present Ma-Ma Footware, Ground Floor, Mithulok, Opposite Dadiala Saw Mill, West Boring Canal Road, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-08-2025 The record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The present petition has been filed only for a direction to learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)- VIII, Patna to dispose of the Execution Case No. 79 of 2018, in a time bound manner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is decree-holder, has filed Eviction Case No. 79 of 2018 in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)- III, Patna for execution of decree passed in Eviction Suit No. 452/2014. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has filed Eviction Suit No.452/2014, which was

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.945 of 2025 dt.06-08-2025 2/3 decreed on 04.09.2017 on the ground of personal necessity. The judgment-debtor/defendant/respondent in order to frustrate the decree firstly filed Title Eviction Appeal No. 06/2018 and kept it pending for seven years and subsequently, it was dismissed as withdrawn at his request vide order dated 28.07.2025, after the petitioner filed the present civil miscellaneous petition and thereafter the judgment-debtor filed a civil revision against the order of learned trial court. The learned counsel further submits that in this background, the learned executing court has not proceeded further in the matter emboldening the judgment debtor/respondent.

5. Since the petitioner has come before this Court with limited prayer for expeditious disposal of his execution case which is pending since 2018, I do not think there is any need to issue notice to the respondent.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the petitioner, learned executing court, i.e, Civil Judge (Senior Division)-VIII, Patna is directed to take up the Execution Case No. 79 of 2018 in all earnest and try to dispose of it at the earliest in terms of the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rahul S. Shah Vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and Others, reported in

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.945 of 2025 dt.06-08-2025 3/3 (2021) 6 SCC 418.

7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the present petition stands disposed of.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.08.2025 Transmission Date NA