Sudhir Kumar @ Chhotu @ Sudhir Paswan @ Chhate v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69547 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2018 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar @ Chhotu @ Sudhir Paswan @ Chhate, Son of Bhuneshwar Paswan, Resident of Village Sikaria, P.S. Pali District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 30 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that petitioner had enticed his minor daughter. The girl was recovered and she was found to be major. In her statement recorded under 164 of Cr.P.C. she had stated that she voluntarily and on her sweet will had gone with the petitioner and married to him. The court has also sent the victim in the company of petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 20.08.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69547 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Jehanabad, in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 30 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T