Md. Farman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63085 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2019 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

MD. FARMAN Son of Murtuza Mir Resident of Mir Toli Chowk, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

2.

Md. Arman Son of Murtuza Mir Resident of Mir Toli Chowk, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjana Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-03-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are in custody since 20.06.2019, charge-sheet has been submitted and have antecedent of one case and allegation is of looting bolero vehicle of the informant by some unknown criminals.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR is against unknown, the name of the petitioner transpired based on the information received by the police through spy. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63085 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2022 2/2 is submitted that despite being custody, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade nor incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

The learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the bail application.

Considering the fact the petitioners are in custody since 20.06.2019, charge-sheet has been submitted and they have not been put on T.I. Parade nor any recovery was made from them, the petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 269 of 201 with a condition that one of the bailor of both the competitors shall be their father (Murtuza Mir). The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) sanjeev/- U T