← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11681/2023dismissed

Kundan Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-19Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11681 of 2023 ====================================================== Kundan Prasad Sinha Son of Shri Chhedi Prasad Sinha, Resident of Mohalla - Chandmari Near M.S. College, Motihari, Post Office- Motihari, Police Station - Town, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Joint Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director-in-Chief, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Regional Deputy Director, Health Services Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 7.

The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Mainatand, District - West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 Mr. Anirudh Kumar Singh, AC to GP-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ / writs, order / orders, direction / directions to the respondents for quashing the order which contained in memo no. 530 (12) dated 03.04.2023 by which the representation of the petitioner has been rejected. However, by impugned order without considering the contention raised by the petitioner the same has been rejected which is violation of principle of

Patna High Court CWJC No.11681 of 2023(2) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 Natural Justice.

The petitioner further prays for direction to the respondents for reinstatement of the petitioner with all consequential benefits."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondent authorities for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U